Who are your favourite "guilty pleasure" female characters? The ones who aren't good examples of what can be done with female characters, but who you deeply love anyway?
Have you spent hours creating backstory for a female character whose sole purpose in canon is to provide eyecandy for fanboys? Do you feel wildly passionate about a woman from a badly written, sexist series? Is your OTC a woman who died in the first episode of a new series, before the opening credits even began to roll?
Have you spent hours creating backstory for a female character whose sole purpose in canon is to provide eyecandy for fanboys? Do you feel wildly passionate about a woman from a badly written, sexist series? Is your OTC a woman who died in the first episode of a new series, before the opening credits even began to roll?
no subject
Date: 2008-02-12 11:30 pm (UTC)They just fucked up SO BADLY, you could SEE where the writers just stopped giving a shit and elbowed her aside and then come season two you could almost hear the producers thinking, "shit, Ali's contract isn't up yet? just write the same story over again, nobody will notice!" She had so much potential, and such an AMAZING actress, and--it's almost masochistic that she's my favorite now, because the show failed on almost every front with her, but I'm just mesmerized by how vibrant she is with potential and *untold story* in every scene. I just want that story, over and over again in every possible way.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-12 11:43 pm (UTC)And I love her to pieces. I love the way she doesn't immediately go mushy over her Designated Love Interest. I love the way she knows what society expects of her but would rather just run around India in her silk trousers and shoot things. While having as much casual sex as she can get away with.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 01:53 am (UTC)I have this whole rant about O'Brian and his attitude toward her; what I suspect is that she's a character who got away from him, so he killed her.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 02:17 am (UTC)I think that's pretty much spot-on. He did have that nasty habit of assessing the value of women solely on the basis of their treatment of their men- even docile chaste Sophie comes in for that. I was always a bit puzzled by the way the sympathy level sharply dropped... I can't help but wonder if POB had a bit of Creator Breakdown around that point? I recall he also killed Bonden, who was never anything but puppy-dog loyal...
no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 02:34 am (UTC)I do suspect that he ran out of things to do with Diana -- after 21 books and the long year! -- because he couldn't let Stephen be happy with her. Which just seems odd to me, because it did seem to me that both characters had reached a point where that made sense for them.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-12 11:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-12 11:52 pm (UTC)God, hated, hated, hated what they did to Martha. She never got a story of her own. It especially pisses me off considering how good a lot of the female characters in series one. It's not that they can't write women, it's just that they totally decided not to. And have said so.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-12 11:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-12 11:57 pm (UTC)She WALKED THE EARTH for a YEAR, telling a story and sowing the seeds of victory. Yeah, eat me, Rose. All you did was get possessed by the Tardis and let go of a handle.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 12:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 04:57 am (UTC)I just tend to hate the privilaging of Rose I've noticed in the fandom, that's all.
Martha is awesome, yet she's all about being compared to Rose as lesser, even in canon. It's shortchanging the excellent character the show created.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 02:00 am (UTC)::likes both characters a lot::
no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 04:59 am (UTC)I don't like the fandom's tendency to love her and not-like Martha, and to constantly compare her when they are different individuals.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 12:37 am (UTC)I loved Rose during the first two seasons, but now when I watch first or second-season episodes, all I can think is "This would be so much cooler if Martha was in it!"
Edit: And actually, isn't Rose another example? She started out as a plucky, brave, independent young woman who wanted a life with more to it than working in a shop, living with her mum, and eating chips with her boyfriend. She was great. She became a sodding Time Goddess, for crying out loud! Then in the second season, she became increasingly wrapped up in the Doctor, to the point where she couldn't seem to imagine a life without him, and referred to the day she was separated from him as "the day I died". What the hell?
no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 01:33 am (UTC)I thought the writers did love Martha - after all, she becomes her own Big Damn Hero in a way Rose never did (except maybe in the first episode) - she walked the Earth for a year! Dude!
What I do think was made of fail was the unrequited love - not because the Doctor didn't love her back - but because they went there at all. Seriously - chance to tool around the galaxy and you're only going to go because you fancy the guy driving? That is utterly Made of Fail, which is why I loved Martha's "I'm too good to pine after you speech."
no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 12:01 am (UTC)Sadly, seeing they are still usually written by fanboys, they are ordinarily horribly, horribly mishandled. But they have the potential to be awesome, and sometimes are despite their writers.
Brubaker's stint on Catwoman was pretty solid, but not perfect. I wish they would give her a woman writer who could really write noir and grit and women as human beings - not the mysterious irrational OTHER so many of the writers seem to view them as.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 12:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 01:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-14 01:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 02:41 am (UTC)But she worked her whole marriage. After her husband died, she became a whole new woman. And never, not once, does she doubt that everyone from a local sheriff to an FBI agent should listen to her insights. She will by-God take charge of a situation and take no prisoners.
And she puts up her own storm windows. I really like that.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 03:26 am (UTC)My love for the original characterisation of Smallville's Lana Lang is not a secret; I think I may be almost alone in preferring the early-season Lana who was hopelessly mired in small-town mundanity to the Successful Businesswoman/Ex-Luthor/"I'd Kill To Help You, Clark" version we're getting now. I think there was *so much* story to be told by keeping Lana small-town-centred--because to tell that story, the show would've had to explore who Lana was as a person *and* as the keynote of the life Clark chooses to give up when he becomes Superman, despite his great love of that life/Lana. Such a story wouldn't have needed her to remain small--it would've needed to give her *detail*.
Pretty much all the female characters on Heroes, but especially Claire, Niki, Heidi and Monica. I'm sure I don't need to explain myself, here. *g*
I really wish Supernatural hadn't given up on Jo so friggin' quickly. They had a good actress, they had a good character concept--but, of course, they also had no interest in putting Jo on a level playing field with the boys, and immediate poor reception from some rabid viewers, so *obviously* dropping her like a hot potato was their best option. *eyeroll*
I...could go on. But maybe I'll stop here.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 06:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 07:50 am (UTC)Yeaaaaaaaaah. Where to even *begin* with the soap operas? (No, actually, I know where I'd begin: Alexis. Followed up by Laura, then Lulu, then Kate, then Epiphany [freakin' HELL, writers, COME ON], then Robin, then Georgie, then Tracy then Faith then...)
I'd probably work in a tirade on the dumbass closing shot of the credits with all the guys in tuxes, too. Wherefore the women? WHEREFORE??
...but, see, this is why I stopped where I did. 'Cause once the discussion begins on women-in-soaps these days, it will NEVER END. *bitter*
no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 07:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-14 10:09 am (UTC)Eh, I'm not sure I would've had time this go-round to do the soap ladies justice, anyway. But run this puppy again at some point, and I will definitely schedule time to do a roundup of the GH Women Who Rock(ed). (Because there used to be so *many*! Sigh. Bitter, bitter sigh.)
no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 06:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 07:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 08:04 am (UTC)Maybe she'll start dating 13. OK, probably not.no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 05:08 am (UTC)Silent Hill 4 spoilers here:
Date: 2008-02-13 07:02 am (UTC)Eileen Galvin from Silent Hill 4 isn't exactly the greatest example of what can be done with a female character either, being a victim/"damsel in distress" (though I often defend her canon role). But I love her too and sometimes pair her up with Cynthia.
I have to admit therea are many times when I hear that a character is "there for the fanboys" that I feel like saying "Well, then slap my ass and call me a fanboy." (Rikku from Final Fantasy X comes to mind.) But usually I actually see something in canon about the character too, and actually like their portrayal... though sometimes maybe it's more in my own mind than I would like to admit.
I'd also add Jessie from Pokemon. Pokemon characters tend to be one-dimensional, and Jessie's pretty shrewish on top of that. (Though she had a couple of really nice backstory episodes, actually.) She's also incredibly vain, and the fact that her male counterpart is even more vain only offsets that partly. But I love her to death and at one point spent much time trying to give her more of an emotional range than canon usually did.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 09:23 am (UTC)I adore the pulp-style novel titles: Last Day in Limbo, The Impossible Virgin, Night of Morningstar, A Taste for Death!
She owns a flat in Paris! A villa in Malta! Not only is she a fighting machine of death, she can carve gems, is a crack shot, speaks ten languages (only six fluently!) and has a bit of a weep after the tough jobs, but she only weeps on Willie.
Honestly, I wouldn't bear any of this in a modern novel.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-16 05:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-16 06:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-13 03:27 pm (UTC)Also in that show: Gina Torres as a pirate queen, Claudia Black as Cassandra, Michael Hurst as the Widow Twanky, Lucy Lawless as Xena (obviously), and a number of other cool women. The show was cheesy, but it did women well.
Speaking of cheesy, I always had a bit of a thing of Shalamar from Mutant X, which was a terrible, terrible X-Men rip off, but I watched it anyway pretty just for her.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-14 02:08 am (UTC)Tolkien didn't do anything with Arwen other than make her a good-conduct prize for Aragorn. I figure someone thousands of years old, raised by powerful rulers and magic-users, had to be a more interesting character than a kewpie doll.
OTOH, it's heartening in a way that she's only a cipher -- at least I can read all kinds of cool attributes & backstory into her without having to push back against bad characterization. She's not badly drawn so much as a blank slate.